Use of Complementary and Alternative Therapies in Children With Allergic Rhinitis

dc.authorscopusid 57656957300
dc.authorscopusid 57193387580
dc.authorscopusid 57310376000
dc.authorscopusid 60039605200
dc.contributor.author Can, V.
dc.contributor.author Bulduk, M.
dc.contributor.author Akdoğan, R.
dc.contributor.author Canan, A.
dc.date.accessioned 2025-09-03T16:38:42Z
dc.date.available 2025-09-03T16:38:42Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.department-temp [Can V.] Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, Turkey; [Bulduk M.] Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, Turkey; [Akdoğan R.] Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, Turkey; [Canan A.] Private Clinic, Van İki Nisan Street, Turkey en_US
dc.description.abstract This study aimed to identify complementary and alternative treatment (CAM) methods used by mothers of children with allergic rhinitis (AR) and examine factors influencing these practices. The sample included 155 mothers whose children were diagnosed with AR and visited the Pediatrics Clinic between January and June 2022. Data were collected through interviews using the Descriptive Information Form and Complementary and Alternative Treatment Use Form, each taking 10-15 minutes. Scientific and ethical principles were followed. The mean age of the children was 5.19±4.84 years. Of the mothers, 53.6% perceived their family’s income as equal to expenses, 58.1% were employed, 91.6% lived in nuclear families, and 60.6% were university graduates. CAM methods were used by 49% (n=76) of the mothers, with 65.8% beginning treatments before seeking medical attention, primarily to boost immunity (84.2%). Healthcare providers (48.7%) and close acquaintances (39.5%) recommended CAM. CAM was used alongside conventional treatments by 57.9%, and 64.5% reported benefits. Most mothers (97.4%) experienced no side effects, 93.4% considered using CAM again, and 89.5% would recommend it. Honey, carob, and linden were the most commonly used CAM methods. No significant differences were found between children using CAM and those who did not in terms of age, gender, family income, education, occupation, family structure, or residence (p>0.05). CAM methods were widely used in children with AR. Pediatric nurses should recognize CAM practices, understand potential benefits and risks, and provide guidance. Further research is needed to evaluate CAM's impact on AR treatment. © 2025, Yuzuncu Yil Universitesi Tip Fakultesi. All rights reserved. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.5505/ejm.2025.78379
dc.identifier.endpage 353 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1301-0883
dc.identifier.issue 3 en_US
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-105013131629
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q4
dc.identifier.startpage 346 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.5505/ejm.2025.78379
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/28360
dc.identifier.volume 30 en_US
dc.identifier.wosquality N/A
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Yuzuncu Yil Universitesi Tip Fakultesi en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Eastern Journal of Medicine en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Allergic Rhinitis en_US
dc.subject Child Health en_US
dc.subject Complementary And Alternative Treatment en_US
dc.subject Pediatric Nursing en_US
dc.title Use of Complementary and Alternative Therapies in Children With Allergic Rhinitis en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication

Files