Comparison of Various Methods on Aesthetic Visual Quality Assessment

dc.contributor.author Özvan, H.
dc.contributor.author Bostan, P.
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T17:01:39Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T17:01:39Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.description.abstract The visual landscape aesthetic quality is seen as a resource that is worth preserving in today’s condition. Landscape which is composed of relationship between human and environment is expressed by people’s perception. However this is not just about visual perception, or how we see the land, but also what we hear, smell and feel from our surroundings, and memories or associations that they evoke, are all form the landscape perception. There is not a certain evaluation standard of the visual quality analysis studies which is mostly focusing on the relationship between environmental preferences and the perception of landscape. Therefore, in previous studies it is observed that different methods were used for analysis and evaluation in order to determine the visual quality. Due to predomination of visual experiences in the process of development of perception in the human brain, various assessment methods have been developed to measure the quality through photos of the desired area. While some studies focus on the relationship between demographic characteristics and environmental preferences of users; some studies examine only the relationship between landscape character areas and aesthetic theories that affect visual quality. In studies that uses both of the methods together; the potential quality of the landscape is evaluated by considering the parameters which affect the perception and aesthetic theories as well as by integrating the perspectives of the users. In this review, the parameters that affect the visual quality of the landscape, the elements shaping environmental preferences and methods that are used for visual quality assessment will be compared and recommendations for future planning and design studies will be included. © 2019, Centenary University. All rights reserved. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.29133/yyutbd.432802
dc.identifier.issn 1308-7576
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85065260974
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.432802
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/5241
dc.language.iso tr en_US
dc.publisher Centenary University en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Yuzuncu Yil University Journal of Agricultural Sciences en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Perceptual Parameters en_US
dc.subject Physical Parameters en_US
dc.subject Visual Quality Of The Landscape en_US
dc.title Comparison of Various Methods on Aesthetic Visual Quality Assessment en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.scopusid 57208592557
gdc.author.scopusid 55825406000
gdc.coar.access open access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.description.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp Özvan H., Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Mimarlık ve Tasarım Fakültesi, Peyzaj Mimarlığı Anabilim Dalı, Van, Türkiye; Bostan P., Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Mimarlık ve Tasarım Fakültesi, Peyzaj Mimarlığı Anabilim Dalı, Van, Türkiye en_US
gdc.description.endpage 167 en_US
gdc.description.issue 1 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q3
gdc.description.startpage 159 en_US
gdc.description.volume 29 en_US
gdc.description.wosquality N/A
gdc.identifier.trdizinid 409781
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.index.type TR-Dizin

Files