YYÜ GCRIS Basic veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

The Effect of Age of Titanium Dental Implants on Implant Survival and Marginal Bone Resorption: a 5-Year Retrospective Follow-Up Study

dc.authorscopusid 55318687000
dc.authorscopusid 56789733600
dc.authorwosid Kaplan, Volkan/Abc-9068-2020
dc.contributor.author Cigerim, Levent
dc.contributor.author Kaplan, Volkan
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T17:09:27Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T17:09:27Z
dc.date.issued 2020
dc.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.department-temp [Cigerim, Levent] Van Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Van, Turkey; [Kaplan, Volkan] Tekirdag Namik Kemal Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Tekirdag, Turkey en_US
dc.description.abstract It has been demonstrated that the osteoconductivity, hydrophilicity, and biological capacity of titanium decreases over time, and this phenomenon was described as the biological aging of titanium. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the age of sand-blasted and acid-etched (SLA) titanium dental implants (duration from the production date until the date of dental implant surgery) affects marginal bone resorption and implant survival. This nonrandom convenience-sample retrospective pilot study was carried out in 200 implants of 64 patients. Radiographic measurements were performed on intraoral periapical radiographs. Implants were divided into 2 age groups; group 1 = 0-3 months and group 2 = 36-41 months. A P value < .05 was considered statistically significant. Of the implants, 41% (n = 82) were between 0 and 3 months old, and 59% (n - 118) were between 36 and 41 months old. All (n = 200) of the implants survived and maintained their function. The mean mesial marginal resorption measurement was 0.60 +/- 0.65 mm, and the mean distal marginal resorption was 0.77 +/- 1.07 mm. There was no statistically significant difference between the amount of mesial and distal marginal bone resorption according to implant age (P > .05). In SLA surface titanium implants with adequate initial primary stability and a 3-month osseointegration period before loading, biological aging of titanium did not affect implant survival and marginal bone resorption. en_US
dc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.doi 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-19-00316
dc.identifier.endpage 479 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0160-6972
dc.identifier.issn 1548-1336
dc.identifier.issue 5 en_US
dc.identifier.pmid 32369581
dc.identifier.pmid 32369581
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85097003417
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q2
dc.identifier.startpage 475 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-19-00316
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/7133
dc.identifier.volume 46 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000608042500004
dc.identifier.wosquality Q4
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Allen Press inc en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Biological Aging en_US
dc.subject Titanium Dental Implant en_US
dc.subject Aged Implant en_US
dc.subject Implant Survival en_US
dc.subject Marginal Bone Resorption en_US
dc.title The Effect of Age of Titanium Dental Implants on Implant Survival and Marginal Bone Resorption: a 5-Year Retrospective Follow-Up Study en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files