YYÜ GCRIS Basic veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

A Combined Method for Estimating Ventilatory Threshold

dc.authorid Kara, Mehmet/0000-0002-8864-9706
dc.authorscopusid 57197128468
dc.authorscopusid 6602567191
dc.authorscopusid 6603085201
dc.authorwosid Bediz, Cem/Q-1623-2019
dc.authorwosid Kara, Mehmet/F-4040-2011
dc.contributor.author Kara, M
dc.contributor.author Gökbel, H
dc.contributor.author Bediz, CS
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T16:58:48Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T16:58:48Z
dc.date.issued 1999
dc.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.department-temp Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Fac Med, Dept Physiol, Van, Turkey; Selcuk Univ, Fac Med, Dept Physiol, Konya, Turkey en_US
dc.description Kara, Mehmet/0000-0002-8864-9706 en_US
dc.description.abstract Background. The aims of this study were to compare two new methods (D-max and CUSUM) for determination of the ventilatory threshold and to examine the consequences of estimation by application of these methods in combination. Methods. Experimental design: a comparative design was used, Setting: the study was performed in the Exercise Physiology Laboratory in the Faculty of Medicine, Self uh University, Participants: thirty-two untrained males (20.6+/-1.2 yrs) performed an incremental exercise test on a cycle ergometer, Interventions: there is no intervention. Measures: ventilatory and gas exchange variables were measured breath-by-breath. The ventilatory thresholds were detected by conventional linear regression, CUSUM, D-max and combined CUSUM-D-max methods. Results. The ventilatory thresholds determined by D-max method gave the highest r-values compared to the criterion method. There was no statistical difference between thresholds determined by all methods or by the same method using different variables, Ventilatory thresholds could not be determined by the conventional linear regression method in three subjects but were determined in all subjects by the other three methods. Conclusions. Although all methods presented in this study can be used in the determination of ventilatory threshold, the D-max method was found to be the most valid one, When using the CUSUM method, combining it with the D-max method increases the validity of the measurement. en_US
dc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.endpage 19 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0022-4707
dc.identifier.issue 1 en_US
dc.identifier.pmid 10230163
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-0344573802
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q2
dc.identifier.startpage 16 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/4392
dc.identifier.volume 39 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000079876500003
dc.identifier.wosquality Q4
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Edizioni Minerva Medica en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Ventilatory Threshold en_US
dc.subject Ventilation en_US
dc.subject Anaerobic Threshold en_US
dc.subject Exercise Test en_US
dc.title A Combined Method for Estimating Ventilatory Threshold en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files