YYÜ GCRIS Basic veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

Critical Period of Weed Control in Chickpea Under Non-Irrigated Conditions

dc.authorid Yergin Ozkan, Reyyan/0000-0003-2319-404X
dc.authorscopusid 6506328482
dc.authorscopusid 7006085641
dc.authorscopusid 26030778400
dc.authorscopusid 17433627700
dc.contributor.author Tepe, Isik
dc.contributor.author Erman, Murat
dc.contributor.author Yergin, Reyyan
dc.contributor.author Bukun, Bekir
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T17:26:20Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T17:26:20Z
dc.date.issued 2011
dc.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.department-temp [Tepe, Isik; Yergin, Reyyan] Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Plant Protect, TR-65080 Van, Turkey; [Erman, Murat] Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Field Crops, TR-65080 Van, Turkey; [Bukun, Bekir] Harran Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Plant Protect, TR-63300 Sanliurfa, Turkey en_US
dc.description Yergin Ozkan, Reyyan/0000-0003-2319-404X en_US
dc.description.abstract The present study was conducted during the growing seasons of 2005, 2006, and 2007 to determine the critical period of weed control (CPWC) in chickpea (cv. Aziziye 94). In order to evaluate the beginning of CPWC, weeds were allowed to compete at weekly intervals for 1 to 8 weeks after emergence (WAE) and, at the end of CPWC, plots were kept weed-free at weekly intervals for 1 to 8 WAE by periodic hand hoeing. The beginning and the end of CPWC were based on 5% acceptable yield loss (AYL) levels, which were determined by fitting logistic and Gompertz equations to relative yield data, representing increasing duration of weed-interference and weed-free period, estimated as growing degree days (GDDs). The major weed species were Centaurea depressa Bieb. and Bromus tectorum L. for the 1st year, Salsola ruthenica Iljin., Amaranthus sp. and Heliotropium europaeum L. for the 2nd year and Amaranthus spp., Salsola ruthenica Iljin., Sisymbrium septulatum DC. and Heliotropium europaeum L. for the 3rd year. Overall weed density was 190 plants m(-2) in 2005, 215 plants m(-2) in 2006, and 191 plants m(-2) in 2007. Yield losses were 26.4% in 2005, 31.5% in 2006, and 25.0% in 2007 when the crop was not weeded. It was found that at the 5% AYL level CPWC was 2.32 WAE to harvest in the 1st year, from emergence to harvest in the 2nd year, and from 0.34 WAE to harvest in the 3rd year. The present findings suggest that the determination of CPWC is crucial in chickpea production. en_US
dc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.doi 10.3906/tar-1007-956
dc.identifier.endpage 534 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1300-011X
dc.identifier.issn 1303-6173
dc.identifier.issue 5 en_US
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-80052741230
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q2
dc.identifier.startpage 525 en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid 120444
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1007-956
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/11628
dc.identifier.volume 35 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000296111800008
dc.identifier.wosquality Q1
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Tubitak Scientific & Technological Research Council Turkey en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Chickpea en_US
dc.subject Critical Period en_US
dc.subject Weeds en_US
dc.subject Weed Competition en_US
dc.title Critical Period of Weed Control in Chickpea Under Non-Irrigated Conditions en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files