YYÜ GCRIS Basic veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

Intraoperative and Postoperative Effects of Dexmedetomidine and Tramadol Added as an Adjuvant To Bupivacaine in Transversus Abdominis Plane Block

dc.authorid Tekeli, Arzu Esen/0000-0001-6468-8850
dc.authorid Kurt, Nurettin/0000-0001-7713-5120
dc.authorscopusid 58729122600
dc.authorscopusid 57208593490
dc.authorscopusid 57954345300
dc.authorwosid Kurt, Nurettin/Hdm-9536-2022
dc.contributor.author Korkutata, Zeki
dc.contributor.author Tekeli, Arzu Esen
dc.contributor.author Kurt, Nurettin
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T17:18:33Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T17:18:33Z
dc.date.issued 2023
dc.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.department-temp [Korkutata, Zeki] Bingol State Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Reanimat, TR-12000 Bingol, Turkiye; [Tekeli, Arzu Esen; Kurt, Nurettin] Van Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Fac Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Reanimat, TR-65080 Van, Turkiye en_US
dc.description Tekeli, Arzu Esen/0000-0001-6468-8850; Kurt, Nurettin/0000-0001-7713-5120 en_US
dc.description.abstract Background: We aimed to evaluate the intraoperative hemodynamics, opioid consumption, muscle relaxant use, postoperative analgesic effects, and possible adverse effects (such as nausea and vomiting) of dexmedetomidine and tramadol added as adjuvants to bupivacaine in the transversus abdominis plane block (TAP block) to provide postoperative analgesia. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, controlled trial on patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. After obtaining ethical approval at the Van Yuzuncu Yil University and written informed consent, this investigation was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05905757). The study was conducted with 67 patients with ASA I-II physical status, aged 20-60 years, of either sex who were scheduled for an elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia. Exclusion criteria were the patient's refusal, ASA III and above, a history of allergy to the study drugs, patients with severe systemic diseases, pregnancy, psychiatric illness, seizure disorder, and those who had taken any form of analgesics in the last 24 h. The patients were equally randomized into one of two groups: Group T (TAP Block group) and Group D (Dexmedetomidin group). Standard general anesthesia was administered. After intubation, Group T (Bupivacaine + adjuvant tramadol) = solutions containing 0.250% bupivacaine 15 mL + adjuvant 1.5 mg/kg (100 mg maximum) tramadol 25 mL and Group D (Bupivacaine + adjuvant dexmedetomidine) = solutions containing 0.250% bupivacaine 15 mL + 0.5 mcg/kg and (50 mcg maximum) dexmedetomidine 25 mL; in total, 40 mL and 20 mL was applied to groups T and D, respectively. A bilateral subcostal TAP block was performed by the same anesthesiologist. Intraoperative vital signs, an additional dose of opioid and muscle relaxant requirements, complications, postoperative side effects (nausea, vomiting), postoperative analgesic requirement, mobilization times, and the zero-hour mark (patients with modified Aldrete scores of 9 and above were recorded as 0 h), the third-hour, and sixth-hour visual analog scale (VAS) scores were recorded. The main outcome measurements were the effect on pain scores and analgesic consumption within the first 6 h postoperatively, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and time to ambulation. The secondary aim was to evaluate intraoperative effects (on hemodynamics and opioid and muscle relaxant consumption). Results: It was observed that dexmedetomidine and tramadol did not have superiority over each other in terms of postoperative analgesia time, analgesic consumption, side effect profile, and mobilization times (p > 0.05). However, more stable hemodynamics were observed with dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant. Conclusions: We think that the use of adjuvant dexmedetomidine in the preoperative TAP block procedure will provide more stable intraoperative hemodynamic results compared with the use of tramadol. We believe that our study will be a guide for new studies conducted with different doses and larger numbers of participants. en_US
dc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.doi 10.3390/jcm12227001
dc.identifier.issn 2077-0383
dc.identifier.issue 22 en_US
dc.identifier.pmid 38002616
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85178088173
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q1
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12227001
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/9714
dc.identifier.volume 12 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:001123477800001
dc.identifier.wosquality Q2
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Mdpi en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Bupivacaine en_US
dc.subject Transversus Abdominis Plane Block en_US
dc.subject Dexmedetomidine en_US
dc.subject Tramadol en_US
dc.subject Cholecystectomy en_US
dc.title Intraoperative and Postoperative Effects of Dexmedetomidine and Tramadol Added as an Adjuvant To Bupivacaine in Transversus Abdominis Plane Block en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files