YYÜ GCRIS Basic veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

Enamel Matrix Derivative (Emdogain) or Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft for the Treatment of Adjacent Multiple Gingival Recessions: a Pilot Study

dc.authorscopusid 38861019100
dc.authorscopusid 36475604100
dc.authorwosid Ayhan Alkan, Eylem/G-2720-2013
dc.contributor.author Alkan, E.A.
dc.contributor.author Parlar, A.
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T16:59:55Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T16:59:55Z
dc.date.issued 2013
dc.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.department-temp Alkan E.A., Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, Turkey; Parlar A., Ankara, Turkey, Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey en_US
dc.description.abstract One treatment approach for achieving healing by regeneration is the application of enamel matrix derivative (EMD) during periodontal surgery. The aim of this randomized clinical study was to compare the efficacy of EMD with a connective tissue graft (CTG) for the treatment of adjacent Miller Class l and II multiple gingival recessions. Twelve systemically healthy subjects with at least two Miller Class I or II multiple gingival recession defects affecting adjacent teeth on both sides of the mouth were enrolled. The surgical protocol was performed for both groups. The 56 recession defects were evaluated for recession depth (RD), recession width (RW), percentage of root coverage (PRC), height of keratinized tissue (HKT), probing depth (PD), and clinical attachment level (CAL). All measurements were repeated at 6 and 12 months. The mean PRC at the final evaluation was 89% ± 17% for the coronally advanced flap (CAF) + EMD group and 93% ± 17% for the CAF + CTG group. Both treatments resulted in statistically significant decreases in RD and RW and increases in HKT at 6 and 12 months. There was also a significant CAL gain for both groups. PD remained shallow over time. The results demonstrated that both procedures were successful in treating Miller Class I and II multiple gingival recessions; however, the greater results of the CAF + CTG group did not reach a statistically significant level. © 2013 by Quintessence Publishing Co Inc. en_US
dc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.doi 10.11607/prd.1337
dc.identifier.endpage 625 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0198-7569
dc.identifier.issue 5 en_US
dc.identifier.pmid 23998158
dc.identifier.pmid 23998158
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-84928232583
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q2
dc.identifier.startpage 619 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.1337
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/4811
dc.identifier.volume 33 en_US
dc.identifier.wosquality Q4
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.relation.ispartof International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.title Enamel Matrix Derivative (Emdogain) or Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft for the Treatment of Adjacent Multiple Gingival Recessions: a Pilot Study en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files