YYÜ GCRIS Basic veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

The Short-Term Efficacy of Large-Focused and Controlled-Unfocused (Radial) Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapies in the Treatment of Hip Osteoarthritis

dc.authorid Sah, Volkan/0000-0002-2853-2266
dc.authorscopusid 35113969100
dc.contributor.author Sah, Volkan
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T17:20:00Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T17:20:00Z
dc.date.issued 2023
dc.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.department-temp [Sah, Volkan] Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Dept Sports Med, TR-65040 Van, Turkiye en_US
dc.description Sah, Volkan/0000-0002-2853-2266 en_US
dc.description.abstract Although the classical treatments listed in the guidelines for osteoarthritis are widely used, the majority of patients do not fully recover from their pain. It is a fact that new treatment methods are needed both to relieve pain and restore deteriorated joint function. No study has been found to date that evaluated the efficacy of ESWT in hip OA. This pilot trial is the first in the literature to investigate the comparative effects of the two ESWT types (f-ESWT and r-ESWT) in the treatment of hip OA. Briefly, 148 patients were randomly distributed into the three ESWT groups: focused (f-ESWT), radial (r-ESWT), and sham (s-ESWT). Patients were assessed with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores just before the treatment (0 week), just after the treatment (4th week), and 1 month after completion of the treatment (8th week). VAS and all WOMAC scores were significantly reduced at follow-up points (4th and 8th weeks) in both the f-ESWT and r-ESWT groups compared with baseline (0 week) (for all, p < 0.001). Statistical comparisons between the f-ESWT and r-ESWT groups showed that f-ESWT was superior to r-ESWT for the decrease in VAS and WOMAC scores from baseline to the 4th and 8th weeks (p < 0.001 or p < 0.002). Both r-ESWT and f-ESWT were found to have significant treatment efficacy compared with s-ESWT. However, f-ESWT produced a superior improvement in follow-up parameters compared to r-ESWT. en_US
dc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.doi 10.3390/jpm13010048
dc.identifier.issn 2075-4426
dc.identifier.issue 1 en_US
dc.identifier.pmid 36675709
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85146719394
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q2
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13010048
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/9969
dc.identifier.volume 13 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000919654600001
dc.identifier.wosquality Q2
dc.institutionauthor Sah, Volkan
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Mdpi en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Hip Osteoarthritis en_US
dc.subject Eswt en_US
dc.subject Radial en_US
dc.subject Focused en_US
dc.title The Short-Term Efficacy of Large-Focused and Controlled-Unfocused (Radial) Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapies in the Treatment of Hip Osteoarthritis en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files