YYÜ GCRIS Basic veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

Absorption Ratio of Treatment Couch and Effect on Surface and Build-Up Region Doses

dc.authorid Tugrul, Taylan/0000-0002-0557-1334
dc.authorscopusid 57197793142
dc.authorwosid Tuğrul, Taylan/D-4372-2017
dc.contributor.author Tugrul, Taylan
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T17:03:53Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T17:03:53Z
dc.date.issued 2018
dc.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.department-temp [Tugrul, Taylan] Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Radiat Oncol Dept, Van, Turkey en_US
dc.description Tugrul, Taylan/0000-0002-0557-1334 en_US
dc.description.abstract Aim: In this study, at different fields, energies and gantry angles, treatment couch and rails dose absorption ratio and treatment couch effect on surface and build-up region doses were examined. Background: It is assumed that radiation attenuation is minimal because the carbon fiber couches have low density and it is not generally accounted for during treatment planning. Consequently, it leads to a major dosimetric mistake. Materials and methods: Solid water phantom was used for relative dose measurement. The measurements were done using a Farmer ion chamber with 0.6 cc volume and a parallel plane ion chamber starting from surface with 1 mm depth intervals at 10 x 10 cm(2) field, SSD 100 cm. Measurements were taken for situations where the beams intersect the couch and couch rails. Results: Dose absorption ratio of carbon fiber couch obtained at gantry angle of 180 was 1.52%, 0.69%, 0.33% and 0.25% at different field sizes for 6 MV. For 15 MV, this ratio was 0.95%, 0.27%, 0.20% and 0.05%. The absorption ratio is between 3.4% and 1.22% when the beams intersect with couch rails. The couch effect increased surface dose from 14% to 70% for 6 MV and from 11.34% to 53.03% for 15 MV. Conclusions: The results showed that the carbon fiber couch increased surface dose during posterior irradiation. Therefore, the skin -sparing effect of the high energy beams was decreased. If the effect of couch is not considered, it may cause significant differences at dose which reaches the patient and may cause tissue problems such as erythema. (C) 2017 Greater Poland Cancer Centre. Published by Elsevier Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved. en_US
dc.description.woscitationindex Emerging Sources Citation Index
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.rpor.2017.10.004
dc.identifier.endpage 5 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1507-1367
dc.identifier.issn 2083-4640
dc.identifier.issue 1 en_US
dc.identifier.pmid 29187806
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85034845816
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q3
dc.identifier.startpage 1 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpor.2017.10.004
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/5840
dc.identifier.volume 23 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000425905400001
dc.identifier.wosquality N/A
dc.institutionauthor Tugrul, Taylan
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier Science Bv en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Carbon Fiber Couch en_US
dc.subject Surface Dose en_US
dc.subject Build-Up Region Dose en_US
dc.subject Effect Of Coucha en_US
dc.title Absorption Ratio of Treatment Couch and Effect on Surface and Build-Up Region Doses en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files