Effect of Various Orthodontic Adhesives on Enamel Colour Changes After Fixed Treatment

dc.contributor.author Tunca, Murat
dc.contributor.author Kaya, Yesim
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T17:12:47Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T17:12:47Z
dc.date.issued 2023
dc.description Tunca, Murat/0000-0002-9157-9390 en_US
dc.description.abstract Background The aim of this study was to compare enamel colour changes of incisors and canines produced by various orthodontic adhesives following treatment with fixed appliances. Methods The study included 300 maxillary and mandibular central and lateral incisors, and canines of 25 subjects who finished fixed appliance treatment. The following adhesives were used according to the manufacturer's instructions: Transbond XT (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA), Kurasper F (Kuraray Europe GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany), Grengloo (Ormco Corporation, Glendora, CA, USA) and Light Bond (Reliance Orthodontic Products, Itasca, IL, USA). Different adhesives were placed in each quadrant of the subjects. Pretreatment and posttreatment enamel colours were evaluated at the middle third of the buccal surfaces of teeth using the SpectroShadeMicro Dental Colour Complete Tooth Analysis SystemTM (MHT International, Verona, Italy). Tooth colour was determined using the Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage L* a* b* system, and Delta E values were calculated. Results Pretreatment and posttreatment intragroup comparison results showed significant decreases in L* and b*, as well as insignificant changes in a* for all teeth. Significantly less enamel colour changes occurred in the Kurasper F group compared with the Grengloo and Light Bond groups. Evaluating incisors and canines separately, overall intergroup comparisons were not significant. Enamel colour changes were significantly less only for the canines compared to the incisors in the Transbond XT and Kurasper F groups. The Delta E values were 1.83-2.18 and 1.41-1.95 for incisors and canines, respectively. Conclusion Although statistically less enamel colour changes occurred in the Kurasper F group compared with the Grengloo and Light Bond groups, the observed changes were not clinically relevant. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s00056-021-00338-7
dc.identifier.issn 1434-5293
dc.identifier.issn 1615-6714
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85112330426
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-021-00338-7
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/7997
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Urban & Vogel en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Dental Enamel Color en_US
dc.subject Tooth Discolouration en_US
dc.subject Fixed Orthodontic Appliances en_US
dc.subject Dental Cements en_US
dc.subject Esthetics en_US
dc.subject Dental en_US
dc.title Effect of Various Orthodontic Adhesives on Enamel Colour Changes After Fixed Treatment en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.id Tunca, Murat/0000-0002-9157-9390
gdc.author.scopusid 57210285697
gdc.author.scopusid 57193732048
gdc.author.wosid Kaya, Yeşim/Abh-2493-2020
gdc.author.wosid Tunca, Murat/Aaz-1662-2020
gdc.coar.access metadata only access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.description.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Tunca, Murat] Van Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Dept Orthodont, Fac Dent, TR-65080 Van, Turkiye; [Kaya, Yesim] Ankara Yildirim Beyazit Univ, Dept Orthodont, Fac Dent, Ankara, Turkiye en_US
gdc.description.endpage 133 en_US
gdc.description.issue 2 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q1
gdc.description.startpage 125 en_US
gdc.description.volume 84 en_US
gdc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
gdc.description.wosquality Q4
gdc.identifier.pmid 34379133
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:000684065300001
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.index.type PubMed

Files