Induction of Labor in Great Grandmultipara With Misoprostol

dc.contributor.author Zeteroglu, S
dc.contributor.author Sahin, HG
dc.contributor.author Sahin, HA
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T17:29:06Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T17:29:06Z
dc.date.issued 2006
dc.description.abstract Objective: To compare the efficacy and complications of intravaginal misoprostol application with oxytocin infusion for induction of labor in great grandmultiparous pregnancies with a Bishop score of <6. Study design: Sixty-four great grandmultiparous (delivering the tenth, or greater, infant) pregnant patients with a Bishop score of <6 were randomized in two groups with 32 patients receiving 50 mu g intravaginal misoprostol four times with 4 It intervals, and 32 patients receiving oxytocin infusion for induction of labor starting from 2 mIU/min, increasing it every 30 min with 2 mIU/min increments up to maximum of 40 mIU/min. The time from induction to delivery, the route of delivery, fetal outcome and maternal complications were recorded. Statistical analyses were performed using Mann-Whitney U-test, Chi-Square test and hypothesis test about differences for two proportions (t-test) to determine differences between the two groups. P <= 0.05 was considered significant. Result: The mean time from induction to delivery was 9.91 +/- 4.30 and 10.88 +/- 4.72 h in the misoprostol and oxytocin administered group, respectively, with no significant difference between the groups. The rate of vaginal delivery was 84.4 and 87.5% in the misoprostol and oxytocin administered group, respectively, with no significant difference between the groups (P = 0.72). The rates of placental abruption and postpartum hemorrhage were similar in both groups and no case of uterine rupture occurred. The 1 and 5 min mean Apgar scores were 6.91 +/- 1.57-8.88 +/- 1.39 and 7.22 +/- 1.24-9.06 +/- 0.84 in the misoprostol and oxytocin administered group with no significant differences between the groups (P = 0.38 and 0.51). No case of asphyxia was present. The rate of admission to neonatal intensive care unit was higher in the misoprostol administered group, but the difference was not significant. Conclusion: Intravaginal misoprostol is an alternative method to oxytocin in induction of labor in great grandmultiparous pregnant women with low Bishop scores, as it is effective, cheap and easy to use. Safety about rare complications and neonatal morbidity needs clarifications with further studies. (C) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.07.012
dc.identifier.issn 0301-2115
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-33748054288
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.07.012
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/12237
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier Ireland Ltd en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Induction Of Labor en_US
dc.subject Great Grandmultiparity en_US
dc.subject Misoprostol en_US
dc.subject Oxytocin en_US
dc.title Induction of Labor in Great Grandmultipara With Misoprostol en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.scopusid 8408485500
gdc.author.scopusid 26027617800
gdc.author.scopusid 35577753600
gdc.author.wosid Şahin, Hüseyin Avni/Jwo-9166-2024
gdc.coar.access metadata only access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.description.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp Univ Mustafa Kemal, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, TR-31100 Antakya, Turkey; Univ Yuzuncu Yil, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Van, Turkey; Univ Yuzuncu Yil, Fac Med, Dept Family Med, Van, Turkey en_US
gdc.description.endpage 32 en_US
gdc.description.issue 1 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q2
gdc.description.startpage 27 en_US
gdc.description.volume 126 en_US
gdc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
gdc.description.wosquality N/A
gdc.identifier.pmid 16129547
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:000238005400005
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.index.type PubMed

Files