Comparative Assessment of Brucellosis Detection in Dogs: In-House Elisa Versus Rose Bengal Plate Test Utilizing Rough and Smooth Antigens

dc.contributor.author Akar, Kadir
dc.contributor.author Yuecetepe, Ayfer Guellue
dc.contributor.author Ekin, Ismail Hakki
dc.contributor.author Dadar, Maryam
dc.contributor.author Guerbilek, Sevil Erdenlig
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T17:24:15Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T17:24:15Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.description Akar, Kadir/0000-0003-0894-7357 en_US
dc.description.abstract Brucella canis and smooth Brucella species infections have been reported in dogs globally. In endemic countries such as T & uuml;rkiye, dogs can be infected with both species. The exact incidence of canine brucellosis in T & uuml;rkiye is unknown. This study aims to investigate the seroprevalence of brucellosis in stray dogs undergoing sterilization in Van province, eastern T & uuml;rkiye. In this study, a comprehensive approach was used to ensure reliable incidence of Brucella spp in the dogs. We used the Rose Bengal Plate Test (RBPT) with both antigens from smooth Brucella abortus S99 (RBPT-S) and rough B. canis (RBPT-R) Brucella species to analyze 150 dog blood serum samples. For the in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (i-ELISA), we used a rough Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) antigen from the rough strain (i-ELISA-R) and an O-polysaccharide (O-PS) antigen (i-ELISA-S) from the smooth strain obtained from the OIE Reference Laboratory in Weybridge, UK. Each serum sample underwent analysis using a total of four serological tests, ensuring a thorough and reliable evaluation. Out of 150 serum samples analyzed, 32 (21.3 %) tested positive using the RBPT-S test and 12 (6.6 %) with the RBPT-R test. The i-ELISA-R identified 8 (5.3 %) positive samples, while the i-ELISA-S detected 27 (18 %) positive samples. The presence of B. canis and other Brucella spp. infections was detected in the dog in this region, revealing that canine brucellosis was primarily caused by smooth Brucella species. The test beased -smooth antigens identified a significantly higher number of positive samples compared to the test beased -rough antigens test, suggesting a potential difference in sensitivity or specificity between the two methods. This situation was considered an important risk for both dogs and humans, underscoring the urgent need for further research and the immediate implementation of public health measures to address this issue. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.cimid.2024.102277
dc.identifier.issn 0147-9571
dc.identifier.issn 1878-1667
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85210271426
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cimid.2024.102277
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/11144
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier Sci Ltd en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Brucella Canis en_US
dc.subject Elisa en_US
dc.subject Brucellosis en_US
dc.subject Dog en_US
dc.subject Seroprevalence en_US
dc.title Comparative Assessment of Brucellosis Detection in Dogs: In-House Elisa Versus Rose Bengal Plate Test Utilizing Rough and Smooth Antigens en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.id Akar, Kadir/0000-0003-0894-7357
gdc.author.scopusid 57219280904
gdc.author.scopusid 57917915800
gdc.author.scopusid 7801457916
gdc.author.scopusid 55854080700
gdc.author.scopusid 57190298950
gdc.author.wosid Akar, Kadir/Ahe-5056-2022
gdc.author.wosid Dadar, Maryam/D-3660-2017
gdc.author.wosid Ekin, Ismail/W-4681-2017
gdc.coar.access metadata only access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.description.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Akar, Kadir; Ekin, Ismail Hakki] Van Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Fac Vet Med, Dept Microbiol, Van, Turkiye; [Yuecetepe, Ayfer Guellue; Guerbilek, Sevil Erdenlig] Harran Univ, Fac Vet Med, Dept Microbiol, Sanliurfa, Turkiye; [Dadar, Maryam] Agr Res Educ & Extens Org AREEO, Razi Vaccine & Serum Res Inst RVSRI, Karaj, Iran en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q3
gdc.description.volume 116 en_US
gdc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
gdc.description.wosquality Q2
gdc.identifier.pmid 39612866
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:001370734000001
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.index.type PubMed

Files