Comparison of the Aerobic Contributions To Wingate Anaerobic Tests Performed With Two Different Loads

dc.contributor.author Bediz, CS
dc.contributor.author Gokbel, H
dc.contributor.author Kara, M
dc.contributor.author Ucok, K
dc.contributor.author Cikrikci, E
dc.contributor.author Ergene, N
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T16:58:48Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T16:58:48Z
dc.date.issued 1998
dc.description Ucok, Kagan/0000-0001-6404-4510; Kara, Mehmet/0000-0002-8864-9706 en_US
dc.description.abstract Background. The purpose of the present study was to compare the aerobic contribution of the Wingate anaerobic test by increasing the test load and power output. Methods. Setting: The study was performed in the Physiology Department of the Faculty of Medicine, Selcuk University. Participants: Thirty sedentary male university students volunteered to this study. Experiments: The subjects performed two Wingate tests against resistance of 75 g.kg(-1) and 95 g.kg(-1) body weight on Monark 818E bicycle ergometer. Breath-by-breath oxygen consumption rates were measured using an automated metabolic measurement chart (Sensormedics 2900). Aerobic contribution was determined by dividing energy equivalence of net oxygen consumption to the total work. Results. The mean total work values obtained from tests performed at 75 g.kg(-1) and 95 g.kg(-1) loads were 13.9+/-1.5 kjoules and 14.5+/-1.8 kjoules (t=2.32, p=0.03). Mean total oxygen consumptions were 765+/-105 ml and 770+/-110 mi, respectively (t=0.24, p=0.81). Assuming 20 % mechanical efficiency for both tests, aerobic contributions were calculated as 19.5+/-3.7 % and 18.9+/-3.7 %, respectively (t=1.01, p=0.30). Conclusions. Although the power outputs of the two tests were different, the difference between aerobic contributions was not statistically significant. So, it was failed to say that the increase in the power outputs might be related to higher contribution of anaerobic processes. However, if different mechanical efficiencies could be used, relationship between aerobic contributions of two tests might have been different. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0022-4707
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-2642710055
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/4395
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Edizioni Minerva Medica en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Anaerobic Power en_US
dc.subject Bicycle Ergometer Test en_US
dc.subject Wingate Test en_US
dc.subject Aerobic Contribution en_US
dc.subject Breath-By-Breath en_US
dc.title Comparison of the Aerobic Contributions To Wingate Anaerobic Tests Performed With Two Different Loads en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.id Ucok, Kagan/0000-0001-6404-4510
gdc.author.id Kara, Mehmet/0000-0002-8864-9706
gdc.author.scopusid 6603085201
gdc.author.scopusid 6602567191
gdc.author.scopusid 57197128468
gdc.author.scopusid 23053121600
gdc.author.scopusid 6506309786
gdc.author.scopusid 8687300600
gdc.author.wosid Bediz, Cem/Q-1623-2019
gdc.author.wosid Gökbel, Hakkı/Agx-5763-2022
gdc.author.wosid Ucok, Kagan/J-9685-2015
gdc.author.wosid Kara, Mehmet/F-4040-2011
gdc.coar.access metadata only access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.description.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp Selcuk Univ, Fac Med, Dept Physiol, Konya, Turkey; Yil Univ, Fac Med, Van, Turkey; Celal Bayar Univ, Sch Phys Educ & Sports, Manisa, Turkey en_US
gdc.description.endpage 34 en_US
gdc.description.issue 1 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q2
gdc.description.startpage 30 en_US
gdc.description.volume 38 en_US
gdc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
gdc.description.wosquality Q4
gdc.identifier.pmid 9638029
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:000073524100005
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.index.type PubMed

Files