Does Bilateral Uterine Artery Ligation Have Negative Effects on Ovarian Reserve Markers and Ovarian Artery Blood Flow in Women With Postpartum Hemorrhage

dc.contributor.author Verit, Fatma Ferda
dc.contributor.author Cetin, Orkun
dc.contributor.author Keskin, Seda
dc.contributor.author Akyol, Hurkan
dc.contributor.author Zebitay, Ali Galip
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T17:33:44Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T17:33:44Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.description.abstract Objective: Bilateral uterine artery ligation (UAL) is a fertility-preserving procedure used in women experiencing postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). However, the long-term effects of this procedure on ovarian function remain unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate whether bilateral UAL compromised ovarian reserve and ovarian blood supply. Methods: This prospective study included 49 women aged between 21 and 36 years who had undergone a cesarean section for obstetric indications. Of these, 25 underwent uterine bilateral UAL to control intractable atonic PPH. The control group consisted of 24 women who had not undergone bilateral UAL. Standard clinical parameters, the results of color Doppler screening, and ovarian reserve markers were assessed in all participants at 6 months after surgery. The clinical parameters included age, parity, cycle history, body mass index, and previous medication and/or surgery. Color Doppler screening findings included the pulsatility index (PI) and resistance index (RI) for both the uterine and ovarian arteries. The ovarian reserve markers included day 3 follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels, antral follicle count, and anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels. Results: There were no significant differences in the ovarian reserve markers of day 3 FSH levels, antral follicle count, and AMH levels between the study and control groups (p>0.05 for all). In addition, no significant differences were observed in the PI and RI indices of the uterine and ovarian arteries (p>0.05 for all). Conclusion: In this study, we showed that bilateral UAL had no negative effects on ovarian reserve or ovarian blood supply, so this treatment should be used as a fertility preservation technique to avoid hysterectomy in patients experiencing PPH. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.5653/cerm.2019.46.1.30
dc.identifier.issn 2233-8233
dc.identifier.issn 2233-8241
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85063256687
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2019.46.1.30
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/13593
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Korean Soc Reproductive Medicine en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Ovarian Blood Flow en_US
dc.subject Ovarian Reserve en_US
dc.subject Uterine Artery Ligation en_US
dc.subject Uterine Blood Flow en_US
dc.title Does Bilateral Uterine Artery Ligation Have Negative Effects on Ovarian Reserve Markers and Ovarian Artery Blood Flow in Women With Postpartum Hemorrhage en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.scopusid 6507520907
gdc.author.scopusid 55818321300
gdc.author.scopusid 59534633400
gdc.author.scopusid 56976243300
gdc.author.scopusid 12446601000
gdc.author.wosid Keskin, Seda/Aam-8559-2021
gdc.coar.access open access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.description.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Verit, Fatma Ferda; Akyol, Hurkan; Zebitay, Ali Galip] Univ Hlth Sci, Suleymaniye Matern Res & Training Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Istanbul, Turkey; [Cetin, Orkun] Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Med Fac, Van, Turkey; [Keskin, Seda] Ordu Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Med Fac, Ordu, Turkey en_US
gdc.description.endpage 35 en_US
gdc.description.issue 1 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q2
gdc.description.startpage 30 en_US
gdc.description.volume 46 en_US
gdc.description.woscitationindex Emerging Sources Citation Index
gdc.description.wosquality N/A
gdc.identifier.pmid 30827075
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:000488245100005
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.index.type PubMed

Files