Contribution of Diffusion Weighted Mri To Diagnosis and Staging in Gastric Tumors and Comparison With Multi-Detector Computed Tomography

dc.contributor.author Arslan, Harun
dc.contributor.author Ozbay, Mehmet Fatih
dc.contributor.author Calli, Iskan
dc.contributor.author Dogan, Erkan
dc.contributor.author Celik, Sebahattin
dc.contributor.author Batur, Abdussamet
dc.contributor.author Kotan, Mehmet Cetin
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T17:28:07Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T17:28:07Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.description Ozbay, Mehmet Fatih/0000-0002-3883-4364; Batur, Abdussamet/0000-0003-2865-9379 en_US
dc.description.abstract Background. Diagnostic performance of Diffusion-Weighted magnetic resonance Imaging (DWI) and Multi-Detector Computed Tomography (MDCT) for TNM (Tumor, Lymph node, Metastasis) staging of gastric cancer was compared. Patients and methods. We used axial T2-weighted images and DWI (b-0,400 and b-800 s/mm(2)) protocol on 51 pre-operative patients who had been diagnosed with gastric cancer. We also conducted MDCT examinations on them. We looked for a signal increase in the series of DWI images. The depth of tumor invasion in the stomach wall (tumor (T) staging), the involvement of lymph nodes (nodal (N) staging), and the presence or absence of metastases (metastatic staging) in DWI and CT images according to the TNM staging system were evaluated. In each diagnosis of the tumors, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative accuracy rates of DWI and MDCT examinations were found through a comparison with the results of the surgical pathology, which is the gold standard method. In addition to the compatibilities of each examination with surgical pathology, kappa statistics were used. Results. Sensitivity and specificity of DWI and MDCT in lymph node staging were as follows: N1: DWI: 75.0%, 84.6%; MDCT: 66.7%, 82%;N2: DWI: 79.3%, 77.3%; MDCT: 69.0%, 68.2%; N3: DWI: 60.0%, 97.6%; MDCT: 50.0%, 90.2%. The diagnostic tool DWI seemed more compatible with the gold standard method (surgical pathology), especially in the staging of lymph node, when compared to MDCT. On the other hand, in T staging, the results of DWI and MDCT were better than the gold standard when the T stage increased. However, DWI did not demonstrate superiority to MDCT. The sensitivity and specificity of both imaging techniques for detecting distant metastasis were 100%. Conclusions. The diagnostic accuracy of DWI for TNM staging in gastric cancer before surgery is at a comparable level with MDCT and adding DWI to routine protocol of evaluating lymph nodes metastasis might increase diagnostic accuracy. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1515/raon-2017-0002
dc.identifier.issn 1318-2099
dc.identifier.issn 1581-3207
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85014016665
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1515/raon-2017-0002
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/11959
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Assoc Radiology & oncology en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Gastric Cancer en_US
dc.subject Diffusion Weighted Imaging en_US
dc.subject Mdct en_US
dc.subject Staging en_US
dc.title Contribution of Diffusion Weighted Mri To Diagnosis and Staging in Gastric Tumors and Comparison With Multi-Detector Computed Tomography en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.id Ozbay, Mehmet Fatih/0000-0002-3883-4364
gdc.author.id Batur, Abdussamet/0000-0003-2865-9379
gdc.author.scopusid 21333559300
gdc.author.scopusid 55879313000
gdc.author.scopusid 57193441180
gdc.author.scopusid 26030385100
gdc.author.scopusid 36774252500
gdc.author.scopusid 55853727900
gdc.author.scopusid 54998741200
gdc.author.wosid Ozbay, Mehmetfatih/Mbh-8695-2025
gdc.author.wosid Bulut, Mehmet/Kjl-4135-2024
gdc.author.wosid Batur, Abdussamet/Aac-1482-2020
gdc.author.wosid Yavuz, Alpaslan/H-3947-2014
gdc.coar.access open access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.description.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Arslan, Harun; Batur, Abdussamet; Bora, Aydin; Yavuz, Alpaslan; Bulut, Mehmet Deniz; Ozgokce, Mesut] Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Dept Radiol, DursunOdabas Med Ctr, Van, Turkey; [Ozbay, Mehmet Fatih] Van Training & Res Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Van, Turkey; [Calli, Iskan] Van Training & Res Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Van, Turkey; [Dogan, Erkan] Yuzuncu Yil Univ, DursunOdabas Med Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Van, Turkey; [Celik, Sebahattin; Kotan, Mehmet Cetin] Yuzuncu Yil Univ, DursunOdabas Med Ctr, Dept Gen Surg, Van, Turkey en_US
gdc.description.endpage 29 en_US
gdc.description.issue 1 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q2
gdc.description.startpage 23 en_US
gdc.description.volume 51 en_US
gdc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
gdc.description.wosquality Q3
gdc.identifier.pmid 28265229
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:000397080400004
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.index.type PubMed

Files