Seroprevalence of Tularemia in Risk Groups of Humans and Animals in Van, East of Turkey

dc.contributor.author Bayram, Y.
dc.contributor.author Özkaçmaz, A.
dc.contributor.author Parlak, M.
dc.contributor.author Basbugan, Y.
dc.contributor.author Kiliç, S.
dc.contributor.author Güdücüoʇlu, H.
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T17:00:10Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T17:00:10Z
dc.date.issued 2015
dc.description.abstract Tularemia has become a re-emerging zoonotic disease in Turkey recently. The aims of this study were to determine the seroprevalence of tularemia in humans and their animals living in rural risky areas of our region and to investigate the risk factors. Between January and July 2012, people living in rural areas of Van province (located at eastern part of Turkey) and their domestic animals were included in the study. The sample size was determined by using cluster sampling method like in an event with known prevalence and planned as a cross-sectional epidemiological study. Proportional random sampling method was used to determine which individuals will be included in the study. Presence of tularemia antibodies in the sera of a total 495 voluntary persons (343 female, 152 male; age range: 18-79 years, mean age: 40.61) and their 171 animals (40 cattle, 124 sheep and 7 goats) were screened by microagglutination test using safranin O-stained F.tularensis antigen (Public Health Agency of Turkey). For the evaluation of cross-reactivity between Brucella spp., tularemia positive serum samples were also tested with brucella microagglutination test. Among human and animal samples, 11.9% (59/495) and 44% (76/171) yielded positive results with the titers of ≥ 1:20 in F.tularensis microagglutination test, respectively. However, 69.5% (41 /59) of human sera and 78.9% (60/76) of animal sera demonstrated equal or higher titers in the brucella test, so those sera were considered as cross-reactive. After exclusion of these sera, the seroprevalence for F.tularensis were calculated as 3.6% (18/495) for humans and 9.4% (16/171) for animals. Among the 16 animals with positive results, 12 were sheep, three were cattle and one was goat. The difference between seropositivity rates among the domestic animal species was not statistically significant (p< 0.05). In addition, no statistically significant differences were found between risk factors including insect bite, tick bite, contact with rodents, eating the meat of hunted animals (rabbit), having pet (cat) in home (p> 0.05). In this study, the rate of tularemia seropositivity among humans was similar to the results of previous studies which were performed in our country; however the seropositivity rate of tularemia among domestic animals in our study was higher than the results of a few studies which were conducted on domestic animals. In conclusion, preventive procedures and precautions must be taken into consideration to control the transmission of the infection. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.5578/mb.9966
dc.identifier.issn 0374-9096
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-84953340790
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.5578/mb.9966
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/4904
dc.language.iso tr en_US
dc.publisher Ankara Microbiology Society en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Mikrobiyoloji Bulteni en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Animal en_US
dc.subject Francisella Tularensis en_US
dc.subject Human en_US
dc.subject Seroprevalence en_US
dc.subject Tularemia en_US
dc.title Seroprevalence of Tularemia in Risk Groups of Humans and Animals in Van, East of Turkey en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.id Basbugan, Yildiray/0000-0001-5124-7853
gdc.author.id Parlak, Mehmet/0000-0001-6030-2244
gdc.author.scopusid 23488098800
gdc.author.scopusid 57038953700
gdc.author.scopusid 7003589214
gdc.author.scopusid 36157712500
gdc.author.scopusid 7006243670
gdc.author.scopusid 56495295500
gdc.author.wosid Parlak, Mehmet/Kyp-1879-2024
gdc.author.wosid Basbugan, Yildiray/T-5365-2018
gdc.coar.access metadata only access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.description.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp Bayram Y., Yuzuncu Yìl University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Microbiology, Van, Turkey; Özkaçmaz A., Bitlis State Hospital, Microbiology Laboratory, Bitlis, Turkey; Parlak M., Yuzuncu Yìl University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Microbiology, Van, Turkey, Yüzüncü Yil Üniversitesi Tip Fakültesi, Tibbi Mikrobiyoloji Anabilim Dali, Van, 65200, Turkey; Basbugan Y., Yuzuncu Yil University Veterinary Faculty, Department of Internal Medicine, Van, Turkey; Kiliç S., Public Health Agency of Turkey, Bacterial Zoonoses Reference Research Laboratory, Ankara, Turkey; Güdücüoʇlu H., Yuzuncu Yìl University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Microbiology, Van, Turkey en_US
gdc.description.endpage 541 en_US
gdc.description.issue 4 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q4
gdc.description.startpage 532 en_US
gdc.description.volume 49 en_US
gdc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
gdc.description.wosquality Q4
gdc.identifier.pmid 26649411
gdc.identifier.pmid 26649411
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:000366227900007
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.index.type PubMed

Files