The, Effect of Perforator Location on Epigastric Perforator Flap Survival: an Experimental and Stereological Study in Guinea Pigs

dc.authorid Gundogdu, Cemal/0000-0003-2857-923X
dc.authorscopusid 7006435714
dc.authorscopusid 10143700400
dc.authorscopusid 8714127200
dc.authorscopusid 6701544869
dc.authorscopusid 23488122100
dc.authorscopusid 23666213800
dc.authorwosid Can, Ismail/O-5461-2014
dc.contributor.author Tan, Onder
dc.contributor.author Ergen, Duygu
dc.contributor.author Atik, Bekir
dc.contributor.author Gundogdu, Cemal
dc.contributor.author Calik, Ilknur
dc.contributor.author Can, Ismail
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T17:27:01Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T17:27:01Z
dc.date.issued 2008
dc.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.department-temp [Tan, Onder; Ergen, Duygu] Ataturk Univ, Fac Med, Dept Plast Reconstruct & Aesthet Surg, TR-25240 Erzurum, Turkey; [Atik, Bekir] Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Fac Med, Dept Plast Reconstruct & Aesthet Surg, Van, Turkey; [Gundogdu, Cemal; Calik, Ilknur] Ataturk Univ, Fac Med, Dept Pathol, TR-25240 Erzurum, Turkey; [Can, Ismail] Ataturk Univ, Fac Med, Dept Histol & Embryol, TR-25240 Erzurum, Turkey en_US
dc.description Gundogdu, Cemal/0000-0003-2857-923X en_US
dc.description.abstract One challenge most often seen in perforator-based flaps is the topographic relationship between the flap and its perforator, which determines flap design and pedicle length. Thirty female guinea pigs were used in this study. They were divided into four different groups including three experimental groups (n=8), which were designed as central, lateral, and distal groups according to the perforator location, and one control group (n = 6). Flap survival and vessel density rates were assessed. There was no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) among either the surviving skin areas or the vascular density rates of the experimental groups, although all flaps were necrosed in the control group. We concluded that perforator flaps can safely be raised on the perforators located very distal or lateral to the flaps, as well as central classical location. Moreover, perforator flaps larger than suggested can safely be harvested in the same donor sites. en_US
dc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.doi 10.1055/s-2008-1064921
dc.identifier.endpage 51 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0743-684X
dc.identifier.issn 1098-8947
dc.identifier.issue 1 en_US
dc.identifier.pmid 18548378
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-42049115408
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q1
dc.identifier.startpage 43 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1064921
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/11862
dc.identifier.volume 24 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000254918100008
dc.identifier.wosquality Q2
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Thieme Medical Publ inc en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Epigastric en_US
dc.subject Flap en_US
dc.subject Perforator en_US
dc.subject Stereology en_US
dc.title The, Effect of Perforator Location on Epigastric Perforator Flap Survival: an Experimental and Stereological Study in Guinea Pigs en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication

Files