Efficacy of Local Dexamethasone Used in Operation Area After Lumbar Microdiscectomy on Postoperative Infection

dc.authorscopusid 57200879924
dc.authorscopusid 57200879587
dc.authorscopusid 55439896900
dc.authorscopusid 57007941800
dc.authorwosid Yücel, Murat/Nvm-5842-2025
dc.authorwosid Akyol, Mehmet/A-6865-2018
dc.contributor.author Yucel, Murat
dc.contributor.author Cetin, Eyup
dc.contributor.author Arabaci, Ozkan
dc.contributor.author Akyol, Mehmet Edip
dc.date.accessioned 2025-11-30T19:13:57Z
dc.date.available 2025-11-30T19:13:57Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.department-temp [Yucel, Murat] Yalova Univ, Fac Med, Dept Neurosurg, Yalova, Turkiye; [Cetin, Eyup] Haydarpasa Numune Training & Res Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Cetin, Eyup; Arabaci, Ozkan; Akyol, Mehmet Edip] Van Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Fac Med, Dept Neurosurg, Van, Turkiye en_US
dc.description.abstract Background & Objective: Postoperative wound infection, although relatively uncommon, remains a significant complication of spinal surgery. Preventive strategies must therefore be rigorously implemented before, during and after surgery. While local steroid administration is frequently employed during lumbar microdiscectomy to reduce neural edema, limited evidence exists regarding its effects on infection rates. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of locally applied dexamethasone in the surgical site on the incidence of postoperative infection. Methodology: This retrospective observational study was conducted between January 2020 to December 2022 at the Neurosurgery Departments of Van Y & uuml;z & uuml;nc & uuml; Y & imath;l University Medical School. A total of 200 patients (89 females, 111 males) who underwent lumbar microdiscectomy were included. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received local dexamethasone (8 mg) applied to the surgical site (n = 54) and those who did not (n = 146). No systemic steroids were used in either group. Results: In the dexamethasone group, no patients developed superficial wound infection, whereas 11 patients in the non-dexamethasone group did. No deep infection was observed in either group. Although the reduction in infection was not statistically significant, the local infection rate was significantly higher in the non-dexamethasone group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Local administration of dexamethasone following lumbar microdiscectomy was associated with a lower rate of superficial wound infection compared with no dexamethasone use. Postoperative infection remains an important clinical concern in spinal surgery, and careful attention to perioperative preventive measures is warranted. en_US
dc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.doi 10.12669/pjms.41.10.11756
dc.identifier.endpage 2868 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1682-024X
dc.identifier.issn 1681-715X
dc.identifier.issue 10 en_US
dc.identifier.pmid 41244552
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-105020763931
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q1
dc.identifier.startpage 2864 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.41.10.11756
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/28992
dc.identifier.volume 41 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:001588943700026
dc.identifier.wosquality Q2
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Professional Medical Publications en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Dexamethasone en_US
dc.subject Deep Infection en_US
dc.subject Local Infection en_US
dc.subject Microdiscectomy en_US
dc.subject Postoperative Infection en_US
dc.title Efficacy of Local Dexamethasone Used in Operation Area After Lumbar Microdiscectomy on Postoperative Infection en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication

Files