Comparison of Microwave Ablation and Lobectomy in the Treatment of Benign Thyroid Nodules

dc.contributor.author Turkoglu, Saim
dc.contributor.author Yilmaz, Abdullah Hilmi
dc.contributor.author Yokus, Adem
dc.contributor.author Ulutas, Mehmet Esref
dc.date.accessioned 2025-06-01T20:05:28Z
dc.date.available 2025-06-01T20:05:28Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.description Ulutas, Mehmet Esref/0000-0002-9206-4348 en_US
dc.description.abstract Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and advantages of microwave ablation (MWA) compared to lobectomy in the treatment of benign thyroid nodules. Methods: A total of 105 patients were included in the study, 49 in the MWA group and 56 in the surgical group. The mean age of the patients in the MWA group was 49.5 (+/- 12.8) and 40.2 (+/- 10.1) in the surgical group (p < 0.001). 81.6% of the patients in the MWA group were female and 18.4% were male. 83.9% of the patients in the surgical group were male and 16.1% were female (p = 0.75). Patients were followed for at least 12 months. The study was completed by comparing the two groups in terms of surgery-procedure times, complications, nodule sizes, thyroid function tests, symptoms, volume reduction rates (VRR), and cosmetic improvement scores. Results: The mean maximum nodule diameter in the patient group who underwent MWA was 3.5 (+/- 1) cm at the beginning and 2.3 (+/- 0.9) cm at the end of the 12th month (p < 0.001). VRR was 73.4% (+/- 14.8) at the end of the 12th month (p < 0.001). Cosmetic score was 2.5 (+/- 1) at the first month, 1.7 (+/- 1.1) at the third month, 1 (+/- 1) at the sixth month, and 0.6 (+/- 0.7) at the 12th month (p < 0.001). The procedure time was 15.4 (+/- 4.4) minutes in the patients in the MWA group, while it was 70.7 (+/- 17.2) minutes in the surgical group (p < 0.001). No complications developed in 48 patients (98%) in the MWA group and 38 patients (67.9%) in the surgical group (p = 0.005). Voice change occurred in three patients (5.4%) in the surgical group, hematoma in two (3.6%) patients and voice change in one (1.8%) patient in the MWA group. Hypothyroidism developed in eight patients in the surgical group, while hypothyroidism did not develop in the MWA group (p = 0.007). Conclusion: MWA is a safe and effective treatment method for benign thyroid nodules. It has many advantages over thyroidectomy, such as fewer complications, shorter procedure time, no need for hospitalization and general anesthesia, and good cosmetic results. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1002/jcu.24071
dc.identifier.issn 0091-2751
dc.identifier.issn 1097-0096
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-105004761014
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.24071
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/24999
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Wiley en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Lobectomy en_US
dc.subject Microwave Ablation en_US
dc.subject Thyroid Nodules en_US
dc.subject Ultrasound en_US
dc.title Comparison of Microwave Ablation and Lobectomy in the Treatment of Benign Thyroid Nodules en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.id Ulutas, Mehmet Esref/0000-0002-9206-4348
gdc.author.scopusid 57216209379
gdc.author.scopusid 58635076700
gdc.author.scopusid 56703460700
gdc.author.scopusid 57218277406
gdc.author.wosid Türkoğlu, Saim/Hgd-3488-2022
gdc.author.wosid Ulutaş, Mehmet Eşref/Afh-1697-2022
gdc.coar.access metadata only access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.description.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Turkoglu, Saim; Yokus, Adem] Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Med Fac, Dept Radiol, Van, Turkiye; [Yilmaz, Abdullah Hilmi] Univ Hlth Sci, Van Trainig & Res Hosp, Van, Turkiye; [Ulutas, Mehmet Esref] Derecik State Hosp, Gen Surg, Hakkari, Turkiye en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q3
gdc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
gdc.description.wosquality Q4
gdc.identifier.pmid 40351191
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:001485372700001
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.index.type PubMed

Files