Effect of Desensitizing Agents on the Microtensile Bond Strength of a Two-Step Self-Etch Adhesive To Dentin

dc.contributor.author Arisu, H. D.
dc.contributor.author Dalkihc, E.
dc.contributor.author Uctasli, M. B.
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T17:26:28Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T17:26:28Z
dc.date.issued 2011
dc.description Deniz Arisu, Hacer/0000-0003-0249-8968; Eliguzeloglu Dalkilic, Evrim/0000-0002-1075-9278 en_US
dc.description.abstract The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of cervical hypersensitivity treatments (neodymium yttrium aluminum garnet [Nd:YAG] laser and conventional techniques) on the microtensile bond strengths of adhesives to treated dentin. The buccal cervical enamel of 42 freshly extracted human mandibular third molars was ground flat to expose the cervical dentin. The dentin surfaces were polished with a series of silicon carbide papers, and the smear was removed with an ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid solution. The teeth were randomly divided into six groups as follows: group 1, Vivasens; group 2, BisBlock; group 3, fluoride gel; group 4, Nd:YAG laser; group 5, Clearfil SE + Nd:YAG laser; and group 6, no treatment (control). The specimens were then restored with a two-step self-etch adhesive, with the exception of group 5. Five specimens from each group were restored with a nanohybrid composite resin. The adhesive interface of two specimens from each group was examined using scanning electron microscopy. The specimens were sectioned perpendicularly to the adhesive interface to produce beams (adhesive area 1 mm(2)). The beams were then attached to a microtensile tester and stressed to failure at 1 mm/min. The data were compared using one-way analysis of variance at a significance level of 0.05. The microtensile bond strengths of the control group were significantly higher than those found for group 1, group 2, group 3, and group 4 (p < 0.05). No significant difference was found between group 5 and the control group. Most of the premature failures were seen in group 2 (80%), and the fewest premature failures were seen in group 5 (13.3%). The SEM findings verified the microtensile test findings. In conclusion, desensitizing treatment procedures (with the exception of Clearfil SE + Nd:YAG laser) reduced the microtensile bond strength of a two-step self-etch adhesive to dentin. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Gazi University [03/2007-22] en_US
dc.description.sponsorship This research was supported by Gazi University Scientific Research Projects, number 03/2007-22. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.2341/09-381-L
dc.identifier.issn 0361-7734
dc.identifier.issn 1559-2863
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-80051769486
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.2341/09-381-L
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/11690
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Operative dentistry inc en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.title Effect of Desensitizing Agents on the Microtensile Bond Strength of a Two-Step Self-Etch Adhesive To Dentin en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.id Deniz Arisu, Hacer/0000-0003-0249-8968
gdc.author.id Eliguzeloglu Dalkilic, Evrim/0000-0002-1075-9278
gdc.author.scopusid 7801441563
gdc.author.scopusid 57117844500
gdc.author.scopusid 47562040400
gdc.author.wosid Arä±Su, Hacer/Aad-9478-2019
gdc.author.wosid Dalkılıç, Evrim/Gpk-1321-2022
gdc.coar.access open access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.description.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Dalkihc, E.] Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Operat Dent & Endodont, TR-65080 Kampus, Van, Turkey; [Arisu, H. D.] Gazi Univ, Fac Dent Operat Dent & Endodont, Ankara, Turkey; [Uctasli, M. B.] Gazi Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Operat Dent & Endodont, Ankara, Turkey en_US
gdc.description.endpage 161 en_US
gdc.description.issue 2 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q2
gdc.description.startpage 153 en_US
gdc.description.volume 36 en_US
gdc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
gdc.description.wosquality Q3
gdc.identifier.pmid 21777097
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:000293677700005
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.index.type PubMed

Files