YYÜ GCRIS Basic veritabanının içerik oluşturulması ve kurulumu Research Ecosystems (https://www.researchecosystems.com) tarafından devam etmektedir. Bu süreçte gördüğünüz verilerde eksikler olabilir.
 

Comparison of Microscopy, Elisa, and Real-Time Pcr for Detection of Giardia Intestinalis in Human Stool Specimens

dc.authorid Beyhan, Yunus Emre/0000-0002-1696-4803
dc.authorscopusid 25925735600
dc.authorscopusid 6504565816
dc.authorwosid Tas Cengiz, Zeynep/Hjh-3466-2023
dc.authorwosid Beyhan, Yunus Emre/U-2503-2018
dc.contributor.author Beyhan, Yunus Emre
dc.contributor.author Cengiz, Zeynep Tas
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T17:28:38Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T17:28:38Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
dc.department-temp [Beyhan, Yunus Emre; Cengiz, Zeynep Tas] Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Dept Med Parasitol, Fac Med, Van, Turkey en_US
dc.description Beyhan, Yunus Emre/0000-0002-1696-4803 en_US
dc.description.abstract Background/aim: This study included patients who had digestive system complaints between August 2015 and October 2015. The research was designed to compare conventional microscopy with an antigen detection ELISA kit and the TaqMan-based real-time PCR (RT-PCR) technique for detection of Giardia intestinalis in human stool specimens. Materials and methods: Samples were concentrated by formalin-ether sedimentation technique and microscopic examinations were carried out on wet mount slides. A commercially available ELISA kit (Giardia CELISA, Cellabs, Brookvale, Australia) was used for immunoassay. DNA was extracted from fecal samples of about 200 mg using the QIAamp Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) and the LightCycler Nano system (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) was used for the TaqMan-based RT-PCR assay. Results: A total of 94 stool samples, 38 of them diagnosed positive (40.4%) and 56 of them diagnosed negative by microscopy, were selected for evaluation by antigen detection and molecular assays. The prevalence of G. intestinalis infection was found as 46.8% (n: 44) and 79.8% (n: 75) by ELISA and RT-PCR, respectively. RT-PCR revealed by far the highest positivity rate compared to the other two methods. The difference between these methods was found to be statistically significant (P < 0.05). In comparison to PCR, the sensitivity and specificity of microscopy and ELISA were 50.7% and 100% and 53.3% and 79%, respectively. Conclusion: RT-PCR seems to be much more sensitive and beneficial for rapid and accurate diagnosis of G. intestinalis in human stools. en_US
dc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.doi 10.3906/sag-1612-71
dc.identifier.endpage 1299 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1300-0144
dc.identifier.issn 1303-6165
dc.identifier.issue 4 en_US
dc.identifier.pmid 29156877
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85029514632
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q1
dc.identifier.startpage 1295 en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid 254571
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-1612-71
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/12101
dc.identifier.volume 47 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000408336600037
dc.identifier.wosquality Q3
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Tubitak Scientific & Technological Research Council Turkey en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Giardia en_US
dc.subject Detection en_US
dc.subject Elisa en_US
dc.subject Real-Time Pcr en_US
dc.subject Comparison en_US
dc.title Comparison of Microscopy, Elisa, and Real-Time Pcr for Detection of Giardia Intestinalis in Human Stool Specimens en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files