Comparison of the Shear Bond Strength of Metal Orthodontic Brackets Bonded To Long-Term Water-Aged and Fresh Porcelain and Composite Surfaces

dc.contributor.author Kaya, Yesim
dc.contributor.author Degirmenci, Beyza Unalan
dc.contributor.author Degirmenci, Alperen
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-10T17:33:40Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-10T17:33:40Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.description Unalan Degirmenci, Beyza/0000-0003-1799-7161; Degirmenci, Alperen/0000-0002-7494-4704 en_US
dc.description.abstract Objective: The aim of the present study was to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of metal orthodontic brackets bonded to long-term water-aged and fresh porcelain and composite surfaces. Methods: One porcelain (Vitadur Alpha (VA)) and three composite (Filtek Ultimate (FU), Tetric EvoCeram (TEC), and Gradia Direct Anterior (GDA)) materials were evaluated in the present study. First, 10 discs from each material were prepared and subjected to the aging procedure for 5 years. Then, for comparison, another 10 discs from each material were prepared as fresh surfaces and stored in distilled water for 24 h. Metal brackets were bonded to the prepared disc surfaces, and after being stored in water for 24 h, they were subjected to shear bond test using a universal testing machine. Adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores were obtained by examining the disc surfaces under a stereomicroscope at 10x magnification. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the aged and fresh groups. Results: Although the difference between the SBS between the aged and fresh groups with VA, FU, and TEC was not significant, the SBS was significantly higher in the fresh group with GDA. With regard to ARI scores, there was no significant difference between the aged and fresh groups with FU and GDA, whereas the ARI scores of the aged groups with VA and TEC were higher. Conclusion: It was concluded that the aged restoration materials have a distinctive influence on the SBS of metal orthodontic brackets. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.18034
dc.identifier.issn 2148-9505
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85069787801
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.18034
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/13575
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Galenos Publ House en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Aging en_US
dc.subject Porcelain en_US
dc.subject Composite en_US
dc.subject Bond Strength en_US
dc.subject Metal Brackets en_US
dc.title Comparison of the Shear Bond Strength of Metal Orthodontic Brackets Bonded To Long-Term Water-Aged and Fresh Porcelain and Composite Surfaces en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.id Unalan Degirmenci, Beyza/0000-0003-1799-7161
gdc.author.id Degirmenci, Alperen/0000-0002-7494-4704
gdc.author.scopusid 57193732048
gdc.author.scopusid 57210176205
gdc.author.scopusid 57203147745
gdc.author.wosid Kaya, Yeşim/Abh-2493-2020
gdc.author.wosid Unalan Degirmenci, Beyza/Glv-2036-2022
gdc.author.wosid Degirmenci, Alperen/Aag-2131-2021
gdc.coar.access open access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.description.department T.C. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Kaya, Yesim] Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Orthodont, Van, Turkey; [Degirmenci, Beyza Unalan] Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Van, Turkey; [Degirmenci, Alperen] Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Van, Turkey en_US
gdc.description.endpage 33 en_US
gdc.description.issue 1 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q2
gdc.description.startpage 28 en_US
gdc.description.volume 32 en_US
gdc.description.woscitationindex Emerging Sources Citation Index
gdc.description.wosquality N/A
gdc.identifier.pmid 30944897
gdc.identifier.trdizinid 308794
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:000462161300006
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.index.type TR-Dizin
gdc.index.type PubMed

Files